Smith v. Trammell
Petitioner: Roderick L Smith
Respondent: Anita Trammell
Case Number: 5:2014cv00579
Filed: June 5, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Pittsburg
Presiding Judge: Gary M. Purcell
Presiding Judge: David L. Russell
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 47 MEMORANDUM OPINION denying 18 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 38 denying Motion for Hearing; denying 20 Motion for Discovery; Judgment will enter accordingly, as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 7/13/17. (jw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Trammell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Roderick L Smith
Represented By: Thomas D Hird
Represented By: Emma V Rolls
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Anita Trammell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?