Smith v. Standard Life Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: Gregory Smith
Defendant: Standard Life Insurance Company and Carlisle Corporation
Case Number: 5:2015cv01126
Filed: October 8, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Tim Leonard
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 124 ORDER denying 92 Motion to Tax Attorney's Fees and Litigation Costs. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 10/2/2020. (mb)
December 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER granting 91 Motion to Vacate Protective Order and Engage in Discovery 92 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Litigation Costs. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 12/6/219. (mb)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 89 MEMORANDUM of DECISION. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 10/18/2019. (mb)
February 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER re 81 Order. the case shall proceed to a determination of the merits of Plaintiffs ERISA claims based on the existing record and prior briefs, together with supplemental briefs regarding the issue of prejudgment interest due either as a po licy benefit under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B) or an equitable remedy under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3). Plaintiff shall file a supplemental brief on this issue within 21 days from the date of this Order. Defendants shall respond within 14 days thereafter. Each partys brief shall not exceed 10 pages in length.. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 2/11/2019. (mb)
February 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER denying 37 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment Against Standard Insurance Company on His Second Claim for Relief. Parties shall file their Joint Motion for a Second Scheduling Order regarding a second phase of briefing on Plaintiff's remaining claims within 7 days. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 2/2/2018. (mb)
September 29, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER denying 44 Motion to Strike Documents Outside the Administrative Record or in the Alternative for Leave to Respond to Defendant Carlisle Corporation's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 9/29/2017. (mb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Standard Life Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory Smith
Represented By: James W Dunham, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Standard Life Insurance Company
Represented By: Leasa M Stewart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carlisle Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?