Barclay v. Bryant
Petitioner: Wayne Handley Barclay
Respondent: Jason Bryant
Case Number: 5:2015cv01369
Filed: December 21, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Alfalfa
Presiding Judge: Charles B Goodwin
Presiding Judge: Vicki Miles-LaGrange
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 25 , denying 22 and 24 petitioner's requests for an evidentiary hearing and appointed counsel and denying petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 11/13/2017. (ks)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barclay v. Bryant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Wayne Handley Barclay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jason Bryant
Represented By: Thomas L Tucker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?