CRB Resources Inc v. Newfield Exploration Mid-Continent Inc

Plaintiff: CRB Resources Inc
Defendant: Newfield Exploration Mid-Continent Inc
Case Number: 5:2016cv01270
Filed: November 7, 2016
Court: Oklahoma Western District Court
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Kingfisher
Presiding Judge: David L. Russell
Nature of Suit: Torts to Land
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 28, 2018 94 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 74 Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss, denied Motion to Strike, as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 8/28/18. (jw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CRB Resources Inc v. Newfield Exploration Mid-Continent Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CRB Resources Inc
Represented By: Nathaniel S Mattison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Newfield Exploration Mid-Continent Inc
Represented By: Mark D Christiansen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?