Sawyers v. Edwards et al
| Andrew Linton Sawyers |
| Randell Edwards and FNU Cooper |
| 5:2017cv00052 |
| January 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| Woodward |
| Joe Heaton |
| Bernard M. Jones |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
122
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 119 of Magistrate Judge Bernard Jones...for the reasons stated in the report and recommendation... 102 defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 02/12/2019. (lam)
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 107 of Magistrate Judge Bernard M. Jones...the court adopts the report and recommendation and denies plaintiff's motion requesting a full medical exam 103 ; this order does not terminate the referral. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 9/24/2018. (cla)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 35 of Magistrate Judge Bernard M. Jones...the court grants defendant Cooper's motion to dismiss 23 and dismisses plaintiff's claims against defendant Cooper without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction based on insufficient service of process; plaintiff is granted 21 days within which to effect service upon Dr. Cooper; this order does not terminate the referral to the magistrate judge. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 9/18/2017. (cla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
