Adams v. KRG Belle Isle LLC
Adams and Guadalupe Adams |
KRG Belle Isle LLC |
5:2017cv00213 |
February 28, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Oklahoma City Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Lee R West |
Civil Rights: Amer. w/Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Guadalupe Adams (Monismith, Pete) |
Filing 7 ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSING ORDER: This action is administratively terminated without prejudice to the rights of the parties to reopen for entry of any stipulation or order. If not reopened within 30 days to obtain final determination, action is deemed dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Lee R. West on 3/29/2017. (kb) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement by Guadalupe Adams (Monismith, Pete) |
Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Don S Strong on behalf of Guadalupe Adams (Strong, Don) |
Filing 4 NOTICE (other) by Guadalupe Adams of Association with Local Counsel (Monismith, Pete) |
Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Pete M Monismith on behalf of Guadalupe Adams (Monismith, Pete) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to KRG Belle Isle LLC. (ml) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KRG Belle Isle LLC filed by Guadalupe Adams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ml) |
PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1087-2445989. (Monismith, Pete) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.