Jones v. Moore Police Department et al
Plaintiff: David Erwin Jones, Jr
Defendant: Moore Police Department, FNU Queen and Cleveland County Detention Center
Case Number: 5:2017cv01141
Filed: October 19, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Cleveland
Presiding Judge: Stephen P. Friot
Presiding Judge: Bernard M. Jones
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER ADOPTING 27 Report and Recommendation, GRANTING 26 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by FNU Queen. Plf is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing by 11/15/2018 for his failure to obtain service of process upon dfts Cleveland County Detention C enter Medical Personnel & Cleveland County Detention Center Detention Officer within 90 days from Magistrate Judge Bernard M. Jones' 1/9/2018 order. If plf fails to show good cause, the court will consider whether a permissive extension of time to effect service is warranted. At that point, the court may, in its discretion, either dismiss the action against the dfts w/o prejudice or extend the time for service. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 11/6/2018. (llg)
May 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER ADOPTING 23 Report and Recommendation, DENYING 21 Motion to Dismiss filed by FNU Queen, RE-REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Bernard M. Jones. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 5/29/2018. (llg)
January 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER ADOPTING 8 Report and Recommendation. Plf's claims against the Moore Police Department & the Cleveland County Detention Center are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C . § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). This matter remains referred to the Magistrate Judge consistent with the original referral. Cleveland County Detention Center (Medical personal and detention officer) and Moore Police Department terminated. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 1/2/2018. (llg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Moore Police Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Erwin Jones, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Moore Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FNU Queen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cleveland County Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?