Stepney v. Sharp
Petitioner: Jimmy D Stepney
Respondent: Tommy Sharp
Case Number: 5:2017cv01164
Filed: October 27, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Atoka
Presiding Judge: David L. Russell
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 21 Report and Recommendation,. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 8/28/18. (jw)
November 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER adopting in part Report and Recommendations re 5 Report and Recommendation.; denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 11/17/2017. (md)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stepney v. Sharp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jimmy D Stepney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Tommy Sharp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?