Earles v. Cleveland et al
Plaintiff: Andrea Earles
Defendant: Rod Cleveland, Dary Stacy, Stephan Koranda, Harlen Fipps and Jimmy Young
Case Number: 5:2017cv01186
Filed: November 1, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Cleveland
Presiding Judge: David L. Russell
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 24 Defendants' Renewed Joint Motion to Dismiss. Counts 4, 5 and 6 remanded to state court. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 9/23/2019. (mb)
October 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER granting 6 defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss. Specifically, the Court dismisses plaintiff's state-law claims against defendants in their official capacities as untimely with prejudice to refiling, dismisses all other claims against defendants without prejudice to refiling and the Court will permit plaintiff to amend any claim that is not dismissed with prejudice to refiling (as more fully set out). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 10/16/2018. (ks)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Earles v. Cleveland et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrea Earles
Represented By: David J Batton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rod Cleveland
Represented By: Jeffrey C Hendrickson
Represented By: Jeffrey C Hendrickson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dary Stacy
Represented By: Jeffrey C Hendrickson
Represented By: Jeffrey C Hendrickson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephan Koranda
Represented By: Jeffrey C Hendrickson
Represented By: Jeffrey C Hendrickson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harlen Fipps
Represented By: Jeffrey C Hendrickson
Represented By: Jeffrey C Hendrickson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jimmy Young
Represented By: Jeffrey C Hendrickson
Represented By: Jeffrey C Hendrickson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?