Patterson v. Rural Water District 2 Cotton County et al
| Billy Ray Patterson |
| Udell Scooter Quinn, David Rodriguez and Rural Water District 2 Cotton County |
| 5:2019cv00627 |
| July 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| David L Russell |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 28 STIPULATION of Dismissal Joint Stipulation of Dismissal by Rural Water District 2 Cotton County. (Kane, Matthew) |
Filing 27
ORDER granting #26 Motion for Extension of Administrative Closing Order Deadline. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 7/13/20. (jw)
|
| Filing 26 THIRD MOTION for Extension of Time of Administrative Closing Order (Joint) by Rural Water District 2 Cotton County. (Kane, Matthew) |
|
Filing 25
ORDER granting #24 Motion to Extend Administrative Closing Order Deadline by two (2) weeks, or until July 10, 2020. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 6/24/20. (jw)
|
| Filing 24 SECOND MOTION for Extension of Time of Administrative Closing Order, Joint by Billy Ray Patterson. (Haupt, Shannon) |
|
Filing 23
ORDER granting #22 Motion for Extension of Administrative Closing Order. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 5/26/20. (jw)
|
| Filing 22 JOINT MOTION for Extension of Time of Administrative Closing Order by Billy Ray Patterson. (Haupt, Shannon) |
| Filing 21 ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSING ORDER: This action is administratively terminated without prejudice to the rights of the parties to reopen for entry of any stipulation or order. If not reopened within 30 days to obtain final determination, action is deemed dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 4/27/20. (jw) |
| Filing 20 JOINT STATUS REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN by Plaintiff Billy Ray Patterson. (Haupt, Shannon) |
| Filing 19 DOCKET: Scheduling Conference set for 5/7/2020 09:30 AM Room 3423 before Honorable David L. Russell. Status Report due by 4/27/2020. (jw) |
| Filing 18 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Rural Water District 2 Cotton County. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Text Messages)(Kane, Matthew) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER: granting in part and denying in part #9 Motion to Dismiss, as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 2/7/20. (jw)
|
| Magistrate Judge Bernard M. Jones no longer assigned to case (jw) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Change of Address by Gerard F Pignato (Pignato, Gerard) |
| Filing 15 REPLY by Defendant Rural Water District 2 Cotton County re #13 Brief as Ordered by the Court filed by Rural Water District 2 Cotton County. (Kane, Matthew) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE re #12 Order,, Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant Cotton County Rural Water District No. 2's Supplemental Brief as Ordered by the Court filed by Billy Ray Patterson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - CCRWD Position Statement with Exhibits 1 and 2, #2 Exhibit 2 - Real Estate Mortgage, #3 Exhibit 3 - State Financial Report, #4 Exhibit 4 - State Budget, #5 Exhibit 5 - Patterson Paycheck, #6 Exhibit 6 - Letter from Alternative Service Concepts)(Haupt, Shannon) |
| Filing 13 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #12 Order,, (Supplemental Brief as Ordered by the Court) by Rural Water District 2 Cotton County. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Employee Group Health Insurance Invoice)(Kane, Matthew) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER re #9 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support filed by Rural Water District 2 Cotton County, David Rodriguez, Udell Scooter Quinn; The Court ORDERS that the parties submit supplemental briefing regarding whether the Cotton County Rural Water District 2 is a state agency that acts as a n arm of the State of Oklahoma. Defendants supplemental brief shall be filed by Tuesday, October 9, 2019. Plaintiff will have until Wednesday, October 23, 2019 to respond. And Defendant will have until Wednesday, October 30, 2019 to reply, as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 9/25/19. (jw)
|
| Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion re #9 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss filed by Udell Scooter Quinn, David Rodriguez, Rural Water District 2 Cotton County. (Kane, Matthew) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support and/or Alternative Motion to Amend filed by Billy Ray Patterson. (Haupt, Shannon) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support by All Defendants. (Kane, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Matthew C Kane on behalf of All Defendants (Kane, Matthew) |
| Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Gerard F Pignato on behalf of All Defendants (Pignato, Gerard) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Billy Ray Patterson. (Leonard, Jana) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Billy Ray Patterson. Rural Water District 2 Cotton County served on 7/19/2019. (Leonard, Jana) |
| Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Shannon C Haupt on behalf of Billy Ray Patterson (Haupt, Shannon) |
| Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Jana Beth Leonard on behalf of Billy Ray Patterson (Leonard, Jana) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Udell Scooter Quinn, David Rodriguez, Rural Water District 2 Cotton County. (nv) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Udell Scooter Quinn, David Rodriguez, Rural Water District 2 Cotton County filed by Billy Ray Patterson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(nv) |
| PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1087-2957842. (Leonard, Jana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
