Carr et al v. Harrison Gypsum LLC et al
Peggy Carr, Candice Carr, Phyllis Hobbs and Clayton Carr |
Arcosa Inc and Harrison Gypsum LLC |
5:2019cv00633 |
July 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Robin J Cauthron |
Torts to Land |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ENTRY of Appearance by Paul D Kouri on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Kouri, Paul) |
Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Nathan D Richter on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Richter, Nathan) |
Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Gerald P Green on behalf of Arcosa Inc, Harrison Gypsum LLC (Green, Gerald) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Arcosa Inc, Harrison Gypsum LLC.(Barahona, Marcus) |
Filing 5 Receipt for Money Received from Harrison Gypsum LLC in the amount of $400.00, receipt number OKW500075016 regarding #1 Notice of Removal. (ac) |
Filing 4 NOTICE (other) by Arcosa Inc Consent to Removal (Barahona, Marcus) |
Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - CORPORATE by Arcosa Inc. . (Barahona, Marcus) Modified on 7/15/2019 to correct filer (nv). |
Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Marcus A Barahona on behalf of Arcosa Inc, Harrison Gypsum LLC (Barahona, Marcus) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Caddo County District Court, case number CJ-2019-53 filed by Harrison Gypsum LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Docket Report, #2 Exhibit 2 Petition, #3 Exhibit 3 Summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(nv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.