Ruvira-Garcia v. Jones et al
Gladys Ruvira-Garcia |
Steve Kelley, Chad Wolf, Don Jones, Kenneth Morris and Marc Moore |
5:2020cv00370 |
April 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Shon T Erwin |
Scott L Palk |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER terminating #4 Motion for Order to Show Cause; granting #6 Motion to Dismiss to the extent she seeks a refund forthe overpayment of her filing fee. The Clerk of Court is directed to refund to Petitioner the amount of $395.00 as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Honorable Scott L. Palk on 5/5/2020. (md) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss (Voluntary Dismissal and Reimbursement of Incorrectly Charged Filing Fee) by Gladys Ruvira-Garcia. Motions referred to Shon T. Erwin. (Briskman, Jacob) |
Filing 5 Receipt for Money Received from Gladys Ruvira-Garcia in the amount of $400.00, receipt number OKW500079705 (knt) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Order to Show Cause by Gladys Ruvira-Garcia. Motions referred to Shon T. Erwin. (Briskman, Jacob) |
Filing 3 Enter ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin. Signed at The Direction of The Honorable Scott L. Palk on 4/22/20. (dtb) |
Filing 2 NO PREVIOUS Cases (dtb) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Gladys Ruvira-Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Decleration, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(dtb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.