Knox v. Sharp et al
Antone Lamandingo Knox |
Donald Trump, John Doe, Tommy Sharp, Scott Crow and Kevin Stitt |
5:2020cv00381 |
April 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Joe Heaton |
Suzanne Mitchell |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell.Motions referred to Suzanne Mitchell.. Signed by the direction of Honorable Joe Heaton on 04/24/20. (knt) |
Filing 5 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Honorable Joe Heaton for all further proceedings. Honorable Bernard Jones no longer assigned to case. Signed by the direction of Honorable Bernard Jones on 04/24/20. (knt) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Order titled "Ex Parte Motion for Preliminary Hearing & temporary Restraining Order Pursuant to F.R.C.P Rule 65(2) & Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof" by Antone Lamandingo Knox. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(knt) |
Filing 3 PREVIOUS Cases (knt) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Antone Lamandingo Knox. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(knt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Scott Crow, John Doe, Tommy Sharp, Kevin Stitt, Donald Trump filed by Antone Lamandingo Knox. (Attachments: #1 Attachment titled "Pro Se Entry of Appearance", #2 Envelope)(knt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.