Lesley v. Prater
| James Patrick Lesley |
| David Prater |
| 5:2021cv00231 |
| March 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Shon T Erwin |
| Charles Goodwin |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Summons Issued Electronically as to David Prater. (kah) |
| Filing 8 LETTER from James Patrick Lesley (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (kah) |
Filing 7
ORDER ADOPTING #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. #5 ) is ADOPTED, and Plaintiff's application (Doc. No. #2 ) is DENIED. This matter is re-referred to Judge Erwin for further proceedings consistent with the initial case referral. Signed by Honorable Charles Goodwin on 04/27/2021. (jb)
|
| Filing 6 Receipt for Money Received from James Patrick Lesley in the amount of $402.00, receipt number OKW500085058 regarding #1 Complaint Mailed to: James Patrick Lesley #438533 HOLDENVILLE-DCF 6888 E 133rd Rd Holdenville, OK 74848-9033 (kah) |
|
Filing 5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION -- Because Plaintiff does not qualify for authorization to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, it is recommended that Plaintiff's motion, ECF No. #2 , be DENIED. It is further recommended that this action be dismissed without prejudice to re-filing unless Plaintiff pays the $402.00 filing fee in full to the Clerk of the Court within twenty (20) days of any order adopting this Report and Recommendation. This Report and Recommendation terminates the referral in the captioned matter. Objections to R&R due by 4/15/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 3/29/2021. (mc)
|
| Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin no longer assigned to case. (mc) |
| Filing 4 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin. Motions referred to Shon T. Erwin. Signed by the direction of Honorable Charles Goodwin on 3/19/2021. (kmt) |
| Filing 3 PREVIOUS Cases (kmt) |
| Notice of Mailing LCvR5.4/Change of Address form, #1 Complaint, #4 Enter Order to : James Patrick Lesley#438533HOLDENVILLE-DCF6888 E 133rd RdHoldenville, OK 74848-9033 (kmt) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James Patrick Lesley. (Attachments: #1 Envelope #2 Attachment 1 - Financial Statements) (kah) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David Prater filed by James Patrick Lesley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Investigative Report, #2 Exhibit 2 - Letter from Attorney Hammersten, #3 Exhibit 3 - State Court Documents, #4 Envelope)(kah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lesley v. Prater | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Patrick Lesley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: David Prater | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
