Davis v. Nunn et al
Petitioner: Brad Lee Davis
Respondent: Scott Nunn and Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Case Number: 5:2021cv01028
Filed: October 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Scott L Palk
Referring Judge: Gary M Purcell
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER denying #9 Motion to Appoint Counsel.See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell on 12/7/2021. (cps)
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Brad Lee Davis. Motions referred to Gary M. Purcell. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(knt)
November 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that Respondent's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time re Doc. #7 is GRANTED and Respondent shall file a Response to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus no later than December 24, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell on 11/29/2021. (cps)
November 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time by Scott Nunn. Motions referred to Gary M. Purcell. (Hunt, Caroline)
November 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Caroline EJ Hunt on behalf of Scott Nunn (Hunt, Caroline)
October 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER FOR RESPONSE BY OKLAHOMA ATTORNEY GENERAL TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell on 10/25/2021. (cps)
October 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Receipt for Money Received from Brad Lee Davis in the amount of $5, receipt number OKW500087758 regarding #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Receipt mailed to Brad Lee Davis#720779HELENA-JCCC216 N. Murray St.Helena, OK 73741-9606 (dtb)
October 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell. Signed by the direction of Judge Scott L. Palk on 10/21/2021. (kmt)
October 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NO PREVIOUS Cases (kmt)
October 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Notice of Mailing LCvR5.4/Change of Address form, #3 Enter Order to Brad Lee Davis#720779HELENA-JCCC216 N. Murray St.Helena, OK 73741-9606 (kmt)
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Brad Lee Davis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kmt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Nunn et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Brad Lee Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Scott Nunn
Represented By: Caroline EJ Hunt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?