Simmons v. Edmond City of et al
| Glynn Simmons |
| Edmond City of, Anthony David Garrett, Oklahoma City City of and Claude L Shobert |
| 5:2024cv00097 |
| January 26, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Bernard M Jones |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support by Claude L Shobert. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Feb 10, 1975 Report, #2 Exhibit 2 - R&R in Simmons v. Ward, #3 Exhibit 3 - Order in Simmons v. Ward, #4 Exhibit 4 - R&R in Simmons v. Ward, 10th Cir., #5 Exhibit 5 - Adams v. Garvin Co., #6 Exhibit 6 - Moses-El v. City & Co of Denver)(Felkner, Stacey) |
| Filing 22 MOTION for Discovery to Begin and Brief in Support by Glynn Simmons. (Wang, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 21 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Glynn Simmons. (Wang, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 20 ENTRY of Appearance by Jordan Cosby Poole on behalf of Glynn Simmons (Poole, Jordan) |
| Filing 19 ENTRY of Appearance by Chris J Collins on behalf of Claude L Shobert (Collins, Chris) |
Filing 18
ORDER ~ Granting #17 Unopposed Motion of Defendant Shobert to Extend the Deadline to File Responsive Pleadings until March 18, 2024. Defendant Shobert shall file his responsive pleading to Plaintiffs Complaint on or before March 18, 2024. Signed by Judge Bernard M. Jones on 2/27/2024. (dwl)
|
| Filing 17 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint Until March 18, 2024 by Claude L Shobert. (Felkner, Stacey) |
| Filing 16 ENTRY of Appearance by Stacey Haws Felkner on behalf of Claude L Shobert (Felkner, Stacey) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Oklahoma City City of.(Mann, Richard) |
| Filing 14 ENTRY of Appearance by Richard Mann on behalf of Oklahoma City City of (Mann, Richard) |
| Filing 13 ENTRY of Appearance by Mary K Goff on behalf of Oklahoma City City of (Goff, Mary) |
| Filing 12 ENTRY of Appearance by Melissa S Hedrick on behalf of Edmond City of (Hedrick, Melissa) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Edmond City of. (White, Joe) |
| Filing 10 ENTRY of Appearance by Kate C. White on behalf of Edmond City of (White, Kate) |
| Filing 9 ENTRY of Appearance by Charles C Weddle, III on behalf of Edmond City of (Weddle, Charles) |
| Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Joe E White, Jr on behalf of Edmond City of (White, Joe) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Glynn Simmons. Claude L Shobert served on 2/5/2024. (Wang, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Glynn Simmons. Oklahoma City City of served on 1/29/2024. (Wang, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Glynn Simmons. Edmond City of served on 1/29/2024. (Wang, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Elizabeth C Wang on behalf of Glynn Simmons (Wang, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Kim T Cole on behalf of Glynn Simmons (Cole, Kim) |
| PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AOKWDC-4345473. (Coyle, John) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Edmond City of, Oklahoma City City of, Claude L Shobert. (naa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Edmond City of, Anthony David Garrett, Oklahoma City City of, Claude L Shobert filed by Glynn Simmons. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(naa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
