Lay v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
Develin Dion Ray Lay |
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and OSBI |
5:2024cv01027 |
October 2, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Stephen P Friot |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER re #11 Notice of Address Change filed by Develin Dion Ray Lay. The court DIRECTS the court clerk to mail #9 Report and Recommendation to plf at his new address. The court EXTENDS the time for plf to file any objections to the Report and Recommendation until 12/9/2024. Plf is again advised that failure to make timely objection to the Report and Recommendation waives the right to appellate review of both the factual findings and legal issues decided in the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Stephen P. Friot on 11/22/2024. (llg) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Change of Address by Develin Dion Ray Lay (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dtb) |
Filing 10 AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Develin Dion Ray Lay. Motions referred to Suzanne Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dtb) |
Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION -- it is recommended that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to pay the initial filing fee as ordered by the Court. This report and recommendation terminates the referral to the undersigned magistrate judge unless and until the matter is re-referred. Objections to R&R due by 12/2/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 11/15/2024. (mc) |
Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin no longer assigned to case. (mc) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #2 and #7 Motions for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. However, Plaintiff shall be required to pay the full $350.00 filing fee as set forth hereafter IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that on or before November 8, 2024, Plaintiff pay an initial partial filing fee of $17.27. See Order as more fully set out. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 10/22/2024. (mc) |
Filing 7 AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Develin Dion Ray Lay. Motions referred to case referral judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Inmate Request, #2 Exhibit 2- Transaction List, #3 Envelope)(dtb) |
Filing 6 ORDER re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Develin Dion Ray Lay -- The Court is in receipt of the documents Plaintiff tendered in this matter. However, the documents are deficient in the area(s) indicated. Plaintiff shall cure the deficiencies designated no later than October 28, 2024. All as more fully set out. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 10/11/2024. (mc) |
Filing 5 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin. Motions referred to Shon T. Erwin. Signed by the direction of Judge Stephen P. Friot on 10/3/2024. (ekw) |
Filing 4 ENTER ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Stephen P. Friot for all further proceedings. Judge Scott L. Palk no longer assigned to case. Signed by the direction of Judge Scott L. Palk on 10/3/2024. (ekw) |
Filing 3 PREVIOUS Cases (ekw) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Develin Dion Ray Lay. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ekw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against OSBI, Oklahoma Department of Corrections filed by Develin Dion Ray Lay. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Requests to Staff, #2 Attachment 2 - Envelope addressed to Internal Revenue Service, #3 Attachment 3 - Cover Page, #4 Envelope)(ekw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.