Salmons v. The State of Oregon DHS et al
||John Salmons, Sr.
||Carter Joni Collection Agency LLC, State of Oregon Attorneys Generals Office, The City of Klamath Falls, Oregon and The State of Oregon DHS
||July 17, 2017
||US District Court for the District of Oregon
||Medford (1) Office
||Michael J. McShane
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Other
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|October 11, 2017
Opinion and Order: the Amended Complaint 11 , is dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis, 2 , is denied. All other pending motions are denied as moot. Final judgment shall be entered in this case.. Signed on 10/11/2017 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (Copy mailed to plaintiff) (cp)
|August 8, 2017
Opinion and Order: Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed with prejudice as to Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against the State Defendants. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 4 is Moot. The complaint is dismissed with leave to ame nd as to the plaintiff's other claims. Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days in which to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file an amended complaint within the allotted time will result in the entry of a judgment of dismissal. The Court defers ruling on Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Proceed IFP 2 until plaintiff files an amended complaint or the time for doing so has expired. Signed on 8/8/2017 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (Copy mailed to plaintiff) (cp)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?