Sheppard v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Petitioner: Heather Sheppard
Case Number: 1:2022cv01129
Filed: August 3, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Ann L Aiken
Referring Judge: Mark D Clarke
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Notice of Correction by Clerk regarding #6 Summons/Service Return,. A Clerical error has been discovered in the case record: The document was missing a case caption cover page. The following corrections were made to the record: A corrected PDF has been uploaded and has replaced the incorrect attachment.The Notice of Electronic Filing will be regenerated to all parties. (cw)
September 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Judge Ann L. Aiken to Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (cw)
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Consent by all Parties to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Standing Order 06-mc-9130, the United States consents to jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge.
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Return of Service Executed as to Commissioner Social Security Administration served on 8/22/2022, answer due on 12/20/2022. Service specifically made upon Local U.S. Attorney, Regional Counsel or Agency, and the U.S. Attorney General. (Haapala, John) (Main Document 6 replaced on 9/7/2022) (cw).
August 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Summons Issued Electronically as to Commissioner Social Security Administration. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (jkm)
August 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Social Security Procedural Order and Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Ann L. Aiken. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (jkm)
August 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #2 . Signed on 8/3/2022 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)
August 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP . Filed by Heather Sheppard. (Haapala, John)
August 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint to Review Final Decision of Commissioner (In forma pauperis status selected). Filed by Heather Sheppard against Commissioner Social Security Administration (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Haapala, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sheppard v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Heather Sheppard
Represented By: John E. Haapala, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Represented By: Renata Gowie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?