MicroDental Laboratories, Inc. v. Hoofard
MicroDental Laboratories, Inc. |
Steve Hoofard |
2:2021cv00482 |
March 31, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Michael H Simon |
Patricia Sullivan |
Negotiable Instrument |
12 U.S.C. ยง 1819 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 22 MINUTES OF ORAL ARGUMENT HEARING: ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF #12 ) is taken under advisement on May 28, 2021. James M. Carman and Vanessa M. Anderson present as counsel for Plaintiff. Angela M. Ferrer and Andrew Altschul present as counsel for Defendant. Court Reporter: Dennis Apodaca. Judge Michael H. Simon presiding. (mja) |
Filing 21 Reply to Motion for Temporary Restraining Order #12 Oral Argument requested. Filed by MicroDental Laboratories, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Anderson, Vanessa) |
Filing 20 Declaration of Angela M. Ferrer ISO Motion to Dismiss. Filed by Steve Hoofard. (Related document(s): Motion to Dismiss #19 .) (Ferrer, Angela) |
Filing 19 Motion to Dismiss . Filed by Steve Hoofard. (Ferrer, Angela) |
Filing 18 Declaration of Steve Hoofard in support of Response. Filed by Steve Hoofard. (Related document(s): Response in Opposition to Motion #17 .) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Decl., #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Decl., #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3 to Decl., #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4 to Decl., #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5 to Decl., #6 Exhibit Exhibit 6 to Decl.) (Ferrer, Angela) |
Filing 17 Response in Opposition to Motion for Temporary Restraining Order #12 . Filed by Steve Hoofard. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Def. Decl. ISO Response, #2 Exhibit Exhs 1-6, #3 Appendix) (Ferrer, Angela) |
![]() |
Filing 15 Waiver of Service of Summons Returned Executed by All Defendants. Filed by MicroDental Laboratories, Inc.. (Anderson, Vanessa) |
Filing 14 Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan to Judge Michael H. Simon. (eo) |
Filing 13 Amended Complaint . Filed by MicroDental Laboratories, Inc. against Steve Hoofard. (Carman, James) |
Filing 12 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order . Filed by MicroDental Laboratories, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E) (Carman, James) |
![]() |
Filing 10 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney James M. Carman. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8073482. Expedited Hearing requested. Filed by MicroDental Laboratories, Inc.. (Carman, James) Modified on 5/7/2021 to correct docket text(ecp). |
Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Vanessa M. Anderson. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8073482 #10 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp) |
Filing 9 Clerk's Notice of Pay.gov Refund regarding Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8018035. The request has been granted and the amount of $402.00 will be refunded to Vanessa Anderson Related Doc #4 Request for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically. (lp) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued Electronically as to Steve Hoofard. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (joha) |
Filing 7 Amended Proposed Summons Filed by MicroDental Laboratories, Inc.. (Anderson, Vanessa) |
Filing 6 Amended Proposed Summons Filed by MicroDental Laboratories, Inc.. (Anderson, Vanessa) |
Filing 5 Amended Proposed Summons Filed by MicroDental Laboratories, Inc.. (Anderson, Vanessa) |
Filing 4 Request for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically regarding Refund Request Due, 3 , Complaint, #1 . Filed by MicroDental Laboratories, Inc.. (Anderson, Vanessa) |
Filing 3 A duplicate payment in the amount of $402.00 was submitted by MicroDental Laboratories, Inc. in the above-referenced case. For information on refund procedures, visit #Requesting a Refund of Electronically Paid Fees on the Court website. Refund Request is Due 4/12/2021. (nd) |
![]() |
Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8018142 Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by MicroDental Laboratories, Inc. against Steve Hoofard (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Promissory Note 1, #2 Exhibit Promissory Note 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons). (Anderson, Vanessa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: MicroDental Laboratories, Inc. v. Hoofard | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: MicroDental Laboratories, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Vanessa M. Anderson |
Represented By: | James M Carman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Steve Hoofard | |
Represented By: | Angela M. Ferrer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.