Cuevas v. Brown et al
Plaintiff: Santos Cuevas
Defendant: Kate Brown, Jesse Wm. Barton, Ellen Rosenblum, Erin Landis and James B. Pratt
Case Number: 2:2021cv01688
Filed: November 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Youlee Yim You
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2022 Filing 14 Motion to Amend Judgment #8 and Injunctive Relief. Filed by Santos Cuevas. (dsg)
January 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: The Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion on Defendants Reliance Interest Requiring Notice in Support of Motion for Reconsideration #12 as Plaintiff's prior Motion for Reconsideration was denied by District Judge Marco A. Hernandez's 1/5/2022, Order and because Plaintiff does not seek any discernable action from the Court in his current motion. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 1/13/2022.) (ps1)
January 7, 2022 Filing 12 Motion titled "Motion on Defendants Reliance Interest Requiring Notice in Support of Motion for Reconsideration". Filed by Santos Cuevas. (joha)
January 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: The Court DENIES Plaintiff's "Motion to Quash Dismissal, Set Aside Dismissal" (ECF No. #9 ) and Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. #10 ). Signed on 1/5/2022 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 1/5/2022.) (dsg)
January 4, 2022 Filing 10 Motion for Reconsideration. Filed by Santos Cuevas. (joha)
January 4, 2022 Filing 9 Motion to Quash Dismissal, Set Aside Dismissal. Filed by Santos Cuevas. (joha)
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this Action is dismissed. The Court certifies that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed on 12/21/2021 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 12/22/2021.) (dsg)
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO DISMISS: The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's Complaint. Because it is clear Plaintiff cannot cure the deficiencies of his Complaint by amendment, this action is DISMISSED. The Court DENIES Plaintiff's "Motion for Jury Demand and Evidentiary Hearing onState Action Liability Issues" (ECF No. #5 ). Signed on 12/21/2021 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez.(Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 12/22/2021.) (dsg)
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND TO COLLECT INMATE FILING FEE: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #1 ) is GRANTED.IT IS ORDERED that the Oregon Department of Corrections, Central Trust Unit, shall collect payments from the trust account of Plaintiff and shall forward those payments to the Clerk of the Court. A copy of this order has been emailed to the Central Trust Unit. Signed on 12/21/2021 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 12/22/2021.) (dsg)
December 13, 2021 Filing 5 Motion for Jury Demand and Evidentiary Hearing on State Action Liability Issues. Filed by Santos Cuevas. (joha)
December 1, 2021 Filing 4 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (dsg)
November 22, 2021 Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 11/22/2021.) (joha)
November 22, 2021 Filing 2 Complaint. Filed by Santos Cuevas against All Defendants. (joha)
November 22, 2021 Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Santos Cuevas. (joha)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cuevas v. Brown et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Santos Cuevas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kate Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jesse Wm. Barton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ellen Rosenblum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Erin Landis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James B. Pratt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?