Mora-Meraz v. Thomas
Petitioner: Antonio Mora-Meraz
Respondent: Jeffery Thomas
Case Number: 3:2008cv00709
Filed: June 12, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland Office
County: Yamhill
Presiding Judge: Ancer L. Haggerty
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 22 Opinion from the USCA regarding Notice of Appeal 18 . AFFIRMED. (din)
March 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Opinion and Order. Antonio Mora-Meraz's petition 1 is DENIED, and the Response to Habeas Petition/Motion to Dismiss 7 is GRANTED. Signed on 3/30/09 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (jlr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mora-Meraz v. Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Antonio Mora-Meraz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jeffery Thomas
Represented By: Suzanne Bratis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?