Mora-Meraz v. Thomas
Antonio Mora-Meraz |
Jeffery Thomas |
3:2008cv00709 |
June 12, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland Office |
Yamhill |
Ancer L. Haggerty |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 Opinion from the USCA regarding Notice of Appeal 18 . AFFIRMED. (din) |
Filing 16 Opinion and Order. Antonio Mora-Meraz's petition 1 is DENIED, and the Response to Habeas Petition/Motion to Dismiss 7 is GRANTED. Signed on 3/30/09 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (jlr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Mora-Meraz v. Thomas | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Antonio Mora-Meraz | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Jeffery Thomas | |
Represented By: | Suzanne Bratis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.