United States of Ameica v. $182,110.00 (US) et al
||One Remington model 870 Express 12 gauge shotgun, One Winchester 17 HMR Rifle, 2006 Chrysler Town and Country Van, One Browning BL 22.22 caliber rifle, $182,110.00 (US) and $11,310.00 (US)
||United States of Ameica
||December 17, 2012
||Oregon District Court
||Portland (3) Office
||Malcolm F. Marsh
|Nature of Suit:
||Drug Related Seizure of Property
|Cause of Action:
||21:881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 16, 2013
ORDER. Claimant Kathy Lepper moves the court to dismiss, or in the alternative, to transfer divisional venue to Pendleton. The government does not oppose the transfer of venue. Accordingly, Claimant's motion for change of venue [9-2] is GRANTED. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to change the divisional venue in this matter to Pendleton. Claimant's alternative motion to dismiss [9-1] is DENIED. The parties are advised that the change of divisional venu e shall not result in the reassignment of this case to another judge because, pursuant to the court's case management plan, civil forfeiture cases are assigned to me on a district-wide basis. If this matter proceeds to trial, the court will con sider at that time whether reassignment is appropriate to accommodate a trial in Pendleton. See Local Rule 3-3(a). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 04/16/2013 by Judge Malcolm F. Marsh. (pvh) Signed on 04/16/2013 by Judge Malcolm F. Marsh. (pvh)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.