Greger Pacific Marine, Inc. v. Oregon Offshore Towing, Inc.

Defendant: Oregon Offshore Towing, Inc.
Plaintiff: Greger Pacific Marine, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2013cv00461
Filed: March 18, 2013
Court: Oregon District Court
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: Michael H. Simon
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 10, 2014 37 Opinion or Order of the Court Opinion and Order - Defendant Oregon Offshore Towing, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 19 ) is DENIED. Signed on 7/10/2014 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Greger Pacific Marine, Inc. v. Oregon Offshore Towing, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oregon Offshore Towing, Inc.
Represented By: Robert A. Green
Represented By: Michael G. Hanlon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Greger Pacific Marine, Inc.
Represented By: Michael E. Haglund
Represented By: Michael K. Kelley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.