Bromfield v. Hsbc Bank Nevada, Na et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 13, 2014
Opinion and Order - Defendant HSBC's motion to dismiss 32 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The following claims by Plaintiff are dismissed with prejudice: TILA claims under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1666 and 1666a, FCRA claim under 15 U.S. C. § 1681s-2(b), and state law claim for breach of fiduciary duty. Plaintiff's false advertising claim, which the Court construes as a claim under Oregons UTPA, is dismissed without prejudice. Thus, the following claims by Plaintiff remain in this action: TILA claim under 15 U.S.C. § 1643; state law claim for breach of contract, state law claim for conversion, and state law claim under Oregon's UDCPA. Additionally, Plaintiff's motion requesting appointment of pro bono counsel 35 is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to appoint pro bono representation for Plaintiff. Signed on 1/13/2014 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|July 29, 2013
OPINION and ORDER: Defendants' motions to dismiss 16 & 20 are GRANTED. Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff has until August 30, 2013, to file an amended complaint that cures the deficiencies identified in this Opinion and Order. If an Amended Complaint is not filed by that date, Judgment will be entered. Signed on 7/29/2013 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?