Porras v. Vial Fotheringham LLP et al

Counter Claimant: Andrea Montag and Vial Fotheringham LLP
Defendant: Andrea Montag and Vial Fotheringham LLP
Counter Defendant: Rigoberto Porras
Plaintiff: Rigoberto Porras
Case Number: 3:2013cv00699
Filed: April 25, 2013
Court: Oregon District Court
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: Anna J. Brown
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 20, 2015 151 Opinion or Order of the Court Stipulated Judgment of Dismissal. Signed on 07/20/2015 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb)
May 21, 2015 145 Opinion or Order of the Court Opinion and Order: Granting in Part Denying in Part Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 103 ; Granting in Part Denying in Part Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 109 . The Court directs the parties to confer and file a single joint statu s report no later than June 12, 2015, to include case-management recommendations. If the parties seek to engage in additional dispositive-motion practice, the parties must specify in the joint status report each issue on which they seek a dispositive ruling. After the Court reviews the report, a case-management conference will be scheduled. Signed on 05/21/2015 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See attached 39 page Opinion and Order for full text. (bb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Porras v. Vial Fotheringham LLP et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Andrea Montag
Represented By: Robert E. Sabido
Represented By: Shane P. Swilley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Vial Fotheringham LLP
Represented By: Robert E. Sabido
Represented By: Shane P. Swilley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrea Montag
Represented By: Robert E. Sabido
Represented By: Shane P. Swilley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vial Fotheringham LLP
Represented By: Robert E. Sabido
Represented By: Shane P. Swilley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: Rigoberto Porras
Represented By: Bret A. Knewtson
Represented By: Mark G. Passannante
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rigoberto Porras
Represented By: Bret A. Knewtson
Represented By: Mark G. Passannante
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?