Carranza et al v. Geico General Insurance Company et al
| Sabrina G. Carranza and Dallis Hughes |
| Geico General Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Company and Government Employees Insurance Company |
| 3:2013cv01932 |
| October 31, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Marco A. Hernandez |
| Insurance |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 635 Breach of Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
OPINION & ORDER: Defendant's Bill of Costs 83 is granted in part, in the amount of $2,230.20. Defendants' Motion for Attorney Fees 84 is granted in full, in the amount of $5,979.50. See 18-page opinion & order attached. Signed on 9/3/2015 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
|
|
Filing
64
OPINION & ORDER: Defendants' motion to dismiss Defendants GEICO and GEICO General 49 is GRANTED. See 9-page opinion & order attached. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
|
|
Filing
47
OPINION & ORDER: Defendants' motion to dismiss 32 is GRANTED. Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings 32 is DENIED as moot. Plaintiff is granted leave to amend the Complaint to allege facts sufficient to demonstrate that she has standing to sue the Moving Defendants. If Plaintiff chooses to amend her complaint, she must do so within 30 days of the date below. See 10-page opinion & order attached. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
