Greisen v. Hanken et al
Doug Greisen |
City of Scappoose, John Does and Jon Hanken |
3:2014cv01399 |
August 29, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland (3) Office |
Michael H. Simon |
Civil Rights: Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 141 Opinion and Order - Defendant Hanken's Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Alternative Motions for New Trial and Remittitur (ECF 120 ) are denied. Signed on 5/12/2017 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) |
Filing 42 Opinion and Order - The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 26 ). The motion is denied with respect to Greisen's First Amendment retaliation claim against Hanken. The motion is granted with respect to all Greisen's state law claims, and those claims are dismissed. Signed on 12/29/2015 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) |
Filing 24 Opinion and Order - Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 21 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff's claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Scappoose are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendant Jon Hanken alleging a violation of Plaintiff's rights under the Fourteenth Amendment is DISMISSED with prejudice. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is DENIED in all other respects. Signed on 3/23/2015 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) |
Filing 16 Opinion and Order - The Court GRANTS without prejudice Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 13 ) all claims against Defendant Hanken and further DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Scappoose and the Doe Defendants. Plaintiff has leave to amend his complaint within 30 days. Signed on 1/5/2015 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.