Nyberg v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Oregon District Court Nyberg v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

Nyberg v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

Plaintiff:	Kirk J. Nyberg
Defendant:	Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Case Number:	3:2015cv01175
Filed:	June 25, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office:	Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge:	Paul Papak
Nature of Suit:	Consumer Credit
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 20, 2017	Filing 64 OPINION & ORDER: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 49 is Granted and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 50 is Denied. Signed on 3/20/17 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)
June 2, 2016	Filing 36 OPINION & ORDER. Nyberg's Motion 30 is granted and denied as follows: 1. The Motion is denied with respect to the First, Fourth, and Seventh Affirmative Defenses. 2. The Motion is granted with respect to the Third, Fifth, and Thirteent h Affirmative Defenses, and those defenses are dismissed without prejudice. 3. The Motion is granted with respect to the Second, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, Twelfth, and Fourteenth Affirmative Defenses, and those defenses are dismissed with prejudice. Additionally, PRA is ordered to file an amended answer within 10 days of the date of this Opinion and Order. Signed on 6/2/2016 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gw)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 20, 2017

Filing 64 OPINION & ORDER: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 49 is Granted and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 50 is Denied. Signed on 3/20/17 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)

June 2, 2016

Filing 36 OPINION & ORDER. Nyberg's Motion 30 is granted and denied as follows: 1. The Motion is denied with respect to the First, Fourth, and Seventh Affirmative Defenses. 2. The Motion is granted with respect to the Third, Fifth, and Thirteent h Affirmative Defenses, and those defenses are dismissed without prejudice. 3. The Motion is granted with respect to the Second, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, Twelfth, and Fourteenth Affirmative Defenses, and those defenses are dismissed with prejudice. Additionally, PRA is ordered to file an amended answer within 10 days of the date of this Opinion and Order. Signed on 6/2/2016 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nyberg v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kirk J. Nyberg
Represented By:	Bret A. Knewtson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?