Tran v. Kuehl et al
Plaintiff: Linh Thi Minh Tran
Defendant: Officer Ryan Kersey, Officer Darryn J. Kuehl and Officer Benjamin J. Toops
Case Number: 3:2016cv00707
Filed: April 25, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: John V. Acosta
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 175 ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation 164 . Therefore, Defendants' Motions to Dismiss 145 146 are GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint 139 is dismissed without leave to amend. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: November 20, 2020 by United States District Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (pjg)
April 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 136 ORDER - The Court ADOPTS in part Magistrate Judge Acostas Findings and Recommendation 123 . Defendants Motions to Dismiss 56 and 61 are GRANTED, and Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint (ECF #52) is dismissed with leave to amend. A Third A mended Complaint, if any, must be filed within 14 days of this Order. Failure to file a Third Amended Complaint will result in dismissal of this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 26th day of April, 2019, by United States District Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (peg)
August 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 119 OPINION and ORDER - For the reasons stated, the court GRANTS Kersey's Request for Judicial Notice (ECF No. 114), and DENIES Tran's Motion to Stay (ECF No. 107). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 13th day of August, 2018, by United States Magistrate Judge. (peg)
February 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation (# 45 ). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motions (# 12 , # 19 ) to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint without prejudice. Plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint by March 3, 2017. This matter is returned to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed on 2/2/17 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (eo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tran v. Kuehl et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Ryan Kersey
Represented By: Gerald L. Warren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Darryn J. Kuehl
Represented By: Alexander Gordon
Represented By: Stephen Lewis Madkour
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Benjamin J. Toops
Represented By: Alexander Gordon
Represented By: Stephen Lewis Madkour
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Linh Thi Minh Tran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?