Preuitt v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
Plaintiff: Kelly Nathan Preuitt
Defendant: John Does 1-10, Oregon Department of Corrections, Colette Peters, Dr. Steve Shelton, M.D. and Heidi Steward
Case Number: 3:2016cv00835
Filed: May 12, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: Paul Papak
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER: Adopting the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation 29 . The Court Grants Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 22 and Dismisses with prejudice Plaintiff's Sixth and Seventh Claims. Signed on 8/15/17 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (gm)
March 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER: Adopting the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation 18 . Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 13 is Granted with prejudice as to Plaintiff's Fourth and Fifth Claims, and without prejudice as to Plaintiff's First, S econd, and Third Claims. Plaintiff is Granted leave to file an Amended Complaint no later than 4/6/2017 to cure the deficiencies set out in the Findings and Recommendation. The Court advises Plaintiff that the Magistrate Judge will review Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and will recommend sua sponte dismissal of the Amended Complaint if it fails to comply with the 3/1/2017 Findings and Recommendation or this Court's Order. Signed on 3/16/17 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (gm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Preuitt v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oregon Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Colette Peters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Steve Shelton, M.D.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Heidi Steward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kelly Nathan Preuitt
Represented By: R. Grant Cook
Represented By: Kevin T. Lafky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?