Claus et al v. Columbia State Bank
| Robert James Claus and Susan Claus |
| Columbia State Bank |
| 3:2016cv01509 |
| July 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| John V. Acosta |
| Contract: Other Contract Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
148
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: It is Ordered that Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Dismiss 147 is Granted and this action is Dismissed with prejudice and without an award of fees or costs to any party. Pending motions, if any, are Denied as Moot. Signed on 2/11/21 by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (Mailed to pro se parties on 2/11/2021) (gm)
|
|
Filing
115
OPINION & ORDER: Columbia's Motion to Dismiss 106 is Granted as to plaintiffs' fraud claim and Denied in all other respects. The parties are ordered to file a stipulated case schedule within thirty (30) days of the date of this order that includes information concerning whether the parties intend to pursue settlement. Additionally, any motion to file a third amended complaint either to attempt to cure the deficiencies addressed herein or to add a tortious breach of good faith and fair dealing claim must be filed within thirty (30) days of this Opinion. Signed on 3/11/20 by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (gm)
|
|
Filing
94
OPINION AND ORDER - For the reasons stated, the Clauses' Motion to Accept the Amended Complaint 77 is GRANTED in part. Columbia's Motion to Dismiss 80 is GRANTED in part. However, the dismissal is granted without prejudice and with le ave to amend with respect to the claims of fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of the obligation of good faith and fair dealing. The dismissal is granted with prejudice with respect to the claims of breach of contract and promissory estoppel. IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of October, 2019 by The Honorable Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. ( (peg) Modified text on 10/31/2019 (peg).
|
|
Filing
65
OPINION and ORDER - For the reasons stated, Columbias motion to strike 24 24, and motion to dismiss 14 are GRANTED. However, the dismissal is without prejudice and with leave to amend. Accordingly, the Clauses may file an amended complaint, re-pleading their claims, to cure the deficiencies stated above, within 30 days of this Opinion and Order (5/17/2018). DATED this 17th day of April, 2018, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (copy mailed to plaintiffs) (peg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
