Lightforce USA, Inc. et al v. Leupold & Stevens, Inc.
||HVRT Corp. and Lightforce USA, Inc.
||Leupold & Stevens, Inc.
||July 25, 2017
||US District Court for the District of Oregon
||Portland (3) Office
||John V. Acosta
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 29, 2021
Opinion and Order: Leupold's Bill of Costs (ECF No. 103 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Under 29 U.S.C. § 1920, Plaintiffs are entitled to costs in the amount of $7,125.21, their original request being reduced by $300.00 and $862.25, for a total reduction of $1,162.25. DATED this 29th day of January, 2021 by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (pjg)
|September 24, 2020
OPINION AND ORDER: Leupold's motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs' claims of infringement of the '123 Patent is GRANTED. DATED this 24th day of September, 2020, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (pjg)
|May 15, 2019
OPINION and ORDER - The terms at issue should be construed as follows: 1. "cross-hair" is "a continuous line in a reticle that intersects at least a second continuous line to create an aiming point"; 2. "primary vertical cros s-hair" is "the most prominent vertical cross-hair which bisects the reticle by passing through its ocular center and intersects the primary horizontal cross-hair"; 3. "reticle" is properly defined as "an optical disc or wafer containing markings or lines, or both, used to help a shooter aim at a target"; 4. "intersecting" means "a crossing of two or more things" and "intersection" is "the point at which two things cross" ; and 5. "rangefinder markings," "rangefinding markings," and "rangefinder" refers to"markings on a reticle forming a numbered scale used to determined the distance to a target."DATED this 15th day of May, 2019, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?