Lightforce USA, Inc. et al v. Leupold & Stevens, Inc.
Plaintiff: HVRT Corp. and Lightforce USA, Inc.
Defendant: Leupold & Stevens, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2017cv01153
Filed: July 25, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: John V. Acosta
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 114 Opinion and Order: Leupold's Bill of Costs (ECF No. 103 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Under 29 U.S.C. § 1920, Plaintiffs are entitled to costs in the amount of $7,125.21, their original request being reduced by $300.00 and $862.25, for a total reduction of $1,162.25. DATED this 29th day of January, 2021 by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (pjg)
September 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 96 OPINION AND ORDER: Leupold's motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs' claims of infringement of the '123 Patent is GRANTED. DATED this 24th day of September, 2020, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (pjg)
May 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 64 OPINION and ORDER - The terms at issue should be construed as follows: 1. "cross-hair" is "a continuous line in a reticle that intersects at least a second continuous line to create an aiming point"; 2. "primary vertical cros s-hair" is "the most prominent vertical cross-hair which bisects the reticle by passing through its ocular center and intersects the primary horizontal cross-hair"; 3. "reticle" is properly defined as "an optical disc or wafer containing markings or lines, or both, used to help a shooter aim at a target"; 4. "intersecting" means "a crossing of two or more things" and "intersection" is "the point at which two things cross" ; and 5. "rangefinder markings," "rangefinding markings," and "rangefinder" refers to"markings on a reticle forming a numbered scale used to determined the distance to a target."DATED this 15th day of May, 2019, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lightforce USA, Inc. et al v. Leupold & Stevens, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HVRT Corp.
Represented By: David A. Casimir
Represented By: Scott E. Davis
Represented By: Todd M. Siegel
Represented By: David W. Staple
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lightforce USA, Inc.
Represented By: David A. Casimir
Represented By: Scott E. Davis
Represented By: Todd M. Siegel
Represented By: David W. Staple
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Leupold & Stevens, Inc.
Represented By: Nathan C. Brunette
Represented By: Brian C. Park
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?