Mattson v. Quicken Loans, Inc. et al
Erik Mattson |
New Penn Financial, LLC, Quicken Loans, Inc., United Mortgage Corp. and Vision Quest Lending |
3:2017cv01840 |
November 16, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland (3) Office |
Youlee Yim You |
Other Statutory Actions |
47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 80 Amended Opinion and Order. For the foregoing reasons, Mattson's motion seeking leave to amend the complaint (ECF # 60 ) is GRANTED. Mattson is ordered to sever the allegations and file amended complaints against each of the defendants individually, as four separate actions with unique case numbers. The motions to dismiss currently held in abeyance (ECF ## 17 , 43 , 44 , 47 ) are DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 6/7/2018 by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (pvh) |
Filing 73 OPINION AND ORDER. Mattson's motion seeking leave to amend the complaint (ECF# 60 ) is GRANTED. Mattson is ordered to sever the allegations and file amended complaints against each of the defendants individually, as four separate actions with unique case numbers. The motions to dismiss currently held in abeyance (ECF ## 17 , 43 , 44 , 47 ) are DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 5/22/2018 by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (pvh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.