Lopez v. Genesis Financial Solutions, Inc.
| Daniel Lopez |
| Genesis Financial Solutions, Inc. and Genesis FS Card Services, Inc. |
| 3:2019cv00950 |
| June 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Marco A Hernandez |
| Consumer Credit |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
Order by Judge Marco A. Hernandez: As this case is reported settled, the parties shall submit Final Papers on or before 9/7/2019. All pending motions are STRICKEN as moot. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)
|
| Filing 15 Notice of Settlement Filed by Daniel Lopez. (Sellers, James) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER: Granting Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #12 . Answer is due by 8/9/2019. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)
|
| Filing 13 Declaration of Michael J. Farrell . Filed by Genesis FS Card Services, Inc.. (Related document(s): Motion for Extension of Time to Answer a Complaint/Petition #12 .) (Farrell, Michael) |
| Filing 12 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Plaintiff's Amended Complaint [Second]. Filed by Genesis FS Card Services, Inc.. (Farrell, Michael) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER: Granting Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #8 . Answer is due by 7/26/2019. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)
|
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Genesis FS Card Services, Inc.. (Farrell, Michael) |
| Filing 9 Declaration of Michael J. Farrell in Support of Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Filed by Genesis FS Card Services, Inc.. (Related document(s): Motion for Extension of Time to Answer a Complaint/Petition #8 .) (Farrell, Michael) |
| Filing 8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Filed by Genesis FS Card Services, Inc.. (Farrell, Michael) |
| Filing 7 Return of Service Executed as to Genesis FS Card Services, Inc. served on 6/21/2019, answer due on 7/12/2019. (Sellers, James) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued Electronically as to Genesis FS Card Services, Inc.. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (ecp) |
| Filing 5 Amended Proposed Summons Filed by Daniel Lopez. (Sellers, James) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Genesis Financial Solutions, Inc.. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (ecp) |
|
Filing 3
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Marco A. Hernandez and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 10/16/2019. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 11/15/2019. Pretrial Order is due by 11/15/2019. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (ecp)
|
| Filing 2 Amended Complaint . Filed by Daniel Lopez against Genesis Financial Solutions, Inc.. (Sellers, James) |
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: 0979-5893067 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Daniel Lopez against Genesis Financial Solutions, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Sellers, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
