Marshall v. Eshraf et al
| George Lee Marshall, Jr. |
| Rahan Eshraf, Babin Rai and 7-Eleven Inc. |
| 3:2019cv01838 |
| November 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Mark D Clarke |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 JUDGMENT action dismissed. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 1/8/20.) (kf) |
Filing 9
Order action dismissed signed on 1/8/20 by Judge Ann L. Aiken.(Mailed to Pro Se party on 1/8/20.) (kf)
|
| Filing 8 Notice of Change of Address. Filed by George Lee Marshall, Jr. (dsg) |
| Filing 7 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (joha) |
| Filing 6 Clerk's Notice of Mailing to George Lee Marshall, Jr regarding Notice of Case Assignment #3 . (joha) |
| Filing 5 Mail Returned - Undeliverable: Notice of Case Assignment #3 sent to George Lee Marshall, Jr. returned as undeliverable. (joha) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Change of Address. Filed by George Lee Marshall, Jr. (kms) (eo). |
| Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 11/15/2019.) (joha) |
| Filing 2 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by George Lee Marshall, Jr against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (joha) |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by George Lee Marshall, Jr. (joha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
