Chandler v. Condor Flugdienst GMBH
Plaintiff: Robert Chandler
Defendant: Condor Flugdienst GMBH
Case Number: 3:2020cv00810
Filed: May 20, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: John V Acosta
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2020 Filing 7 Summons Issued Electronically as to Condor Flugdienst GMBH. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (ecp)
July 8, 2020 Filing 6 Proposed Summons Filed by Robert Chandler. (Coulson, Nicholas)
May 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER by Judge Acosta: GRANTING Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Nicholas A. Coulson #2 and Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney David R. Dubin #3 . (pjg)
May 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 9/18/2020. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 10/19/2020. Pretrial Order is due by 10/19/2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (ecp)
May 21, 2020 Filing 3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney David R. Dubin. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-6729825. Filed by Robert Chandler. (Dubin, David)
May 21, 2020 Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Nicholas A. Coulson. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-6729653. Filed by Robert Chandler. (Coulson, Nicholas)
May 21, 2020 Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Nicholas A. Coulson. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-6729653 #2 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp)
May 21, 2020 Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney David R. Dubin. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-6729825 #3 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp)
May 20, 2020 Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-6724381 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by ROBERT CHANDLER against Condor Flugdienst GMBH (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Kahl, Nicholas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chandler v. Condor Flugdienst GMBH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Chandler
Represented By: Nicholas A. Kahl
Represented By: Nicholas Alexander Coulson
Represented By: David Dubin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Condor Flugdienst GMBH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?