Lonergan v. Providence Health Services

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Oregon District Court Lonergan v. Providence Health Services

Lonergan v. Providence Health Services

Case Number:	3:2020cv00920
Filed:	October 21, 2020
Court:	US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office:	Portland (3) Office
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 16, 2020	Filing 28 ORDER - No party having made objections, this Court follows the recommendation of the Advisory Committee and reviews Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. No such error is apparent. Accordi ngly, the Court ADOPTS Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation, ECF 26 . This case is dismissed without prejudice. The Court shall enter a Judgment concurrent with this Order. Signed on 12/16/2020 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 12/16/2020.) (mja)
October 21, 2020	Filing 25 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint (ECF No. 23 ) is DENIED as MOOT. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(l), a party may file an amended pleading once as a matter of course. Additionally, Plai ntiff has been Ordered to file an Amended Complaint if he wishes to further proceed with this action. Plaintiff simply needs to file the Amended Complaint; no motion is required at this time. Due to recent delays with mail delivery, the court exten ds the deadline to file the Amended Complaint from November 6, 2020 to November 9, 2020. Again, the court cautions Plaintiff to timely file his Amended Complaint and warns him for the final time that no further deadline extensions will be permitte d. LR 16-3. Failure to file the Amended Complaint by November 9, 2020, may result in dismissal of this action. Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 24 ) is DENIED. In light of three previous pro bono appointment terminations , the court ordered that no further pro bono appointments would be made. (Scheduling Order, ECF No. 21 .) The court adheres to that ruling. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 21st day of October, 2020, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta.(Mailed to Pro Se party on 10/21/2020.) (pjg)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 16, 2020

Filing 28 ORDER - No party having made objections, this Court follows the recommendation of the Advisory Committee and reviews Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. No such error is apparent. Accordi ngly, the Court ADOPTS Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation, ECF 26 . This case is dismissed without prejudice. The Court shall enter a Judgment concurrent with this Order. Signed on 12/16/2020 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 12/16/2020.) (mja)

October 21, 2020

Filing 25 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint (ECF No. 23 ) is DENIED as MOOT. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(l), a party may file an amended pleading once as a matter of course. Additionally, Plai ntiff has been Ordered to file an Amended Complaint if he wishes to further proceed with this action. Plaintiff simply needs to file the Amended Complaint; no motion is required at this time. Due to recent delays with mail delivery, the court exten ds the deadline to file the Amended Complaint from November 6, 2020 to November 9, 2020. Again, the court cautions Plaintiff to timely file his Amended Complaint and warns him for the final time that no further deadline extensions will be permitte d. LR 16-3. Failure to file the Amended Complaint by November 9, 2020, may result in dismissal of this action. Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 24 ) is DENIED. In light of three previous pro bono appointment terminations , the court ordered that no further pro bono appointments would be made. (Scheduling Order, ECF No. 21 .) The court adheres to that ruling. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 21st day of October, 2020, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta.(Mailed to Pro Se party on 10/21/2020.) (pjg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lonergan v. Providence Health Services
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?