Kishna
| Anita I. Kishna |
| (None) |
| 3:2022cv00199 |
| February 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| John V Acosta |
| Jeffrey Armistead |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER referring Findings & Recommendation: Application for Leave to Proceed IFP #1 , Amended Complaint #7 , Motion for Appointment of Counsel #3 to Judge Karin J. Immergut. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Armistead.(Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 3/30/2022.) (pjg)
|
| Filing 9 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION: Based on the foregoing, the court recommends Kishna's Amended Complaint (ECF No. #7 ) be DISMISSED with prejudice. Additionally, Kishna's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #1 ) should be GRANTED and her motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. #3 ) should be DENIED. Scheduling Order The Findings and Recommendation will be referred to a district judge. Objections, if any, are due within 14 days. If no objections are filed, then the Findings and Recommendation will go under advisement on that date. If objections are filed, then a response is due within 14 days after being served with a copy of the objections. When the response is due or filed, whichever date is earlier, the Findings and Recommendation will go under advisement. DATED this 30th day of March 2022, by United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Armistead.(Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 3/30/2022.) (pjg) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Armistead. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 3/24/2022.) (cw) |
| Filing 7 Amended Complaint. Filed by Anita I. Kishna. (dino) |
| Filing 6 Civil Cover Sheet regarding Complaint #2 . Filed by Anita I. Kishna. (sb) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO AMEND: Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff is Ordered to file an AMENDED COMPLAINT within 30 days of the date of this ORDER. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file an Amended Complaint within 30 days may result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. Plaintiff is advised that the amended complaint will serve as a complete substitute for the original, and not as a supplement. See Rhodes v. Robinson, 621 F.3d 1002, 1005 (9th Cir. 2010) (explaining that [a]s a general rule, when a plaintiff files an amended complaint, [t]he amended complaint super[s]edes the original, the latter being treated thereafter as non-existent) (quoting Loux v. Rhay, 375 F.2d 55, 57 (9th Cir. 1967)). Plaintiff should also take care to ensure the amended complaint is readable, names a defendant or defendants, specifies the basis for jurisdiction, and captions and numbers her claims clearly. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 9th day of February, 2022, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta.(Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 2/9/2022.) (pjg)
|
| Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 02/07/2022.) (kgc) |
| Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Anita I. Kishna. (kgc) |
| Filing 2 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Anita I. Kishna. (#1 Attachment). (kgc) |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Anita I. Kishna. (kgc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kishna | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Anita I. Kishna | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: (None) | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
