Li et al v. Global Trade Enterprises, Inc., et al
Hongjiang Li, Shouwen Fu, Chen Li and Jiyou Cao |
Global Trade Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Duck House Chinese Restaurant, Haidong Liu, a/k/a John Liu, Sam Doe, David Doe, Sammy Woo, Haidong Liu, Global Trade Enterprises, Inc. doing business as Duck House Chinese Restaurant and John Liu |
3:2022cv00720 |
May 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Stacie F Beckerman |
Labor: Fair Standards |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 16 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Ge Qu. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8551605. Filed by Jiyou Cao, Shouwen Fu, Chen Li, Hongjiang Li. (Qu, Ge) |
Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Ge Qu. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8551605 #16 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp) |
Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Global Trade Enterprises, Inc.. (Stutheit, Peter) |
Filing 14 Answer to #1 Complaint, Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Filed by Sam Doe, Global Trade Enterprises, Inc., David Doe, Haidong Liu. (Stutheit, Peter) |
![]() |
Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Jian Jang. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8530643 #12 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp) |
Filing 12 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Jian Hang. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8530643. Filed by Jiyou Cao, Shouwen Fu, Chen Li, Hongjiang Li. (Hang, Jian) Modified on 5/26/2022 to correct name of counsel requesting Pro Hac Vice admission(ecp). |
Filing 11 Affidavit of Service upon Global Trade Enterprises, Inc. served on 5/23/2022 Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Erickson, Aurelia) |
Filing 10 Affidavit of Service upon Sammy Woo served on 5/23/2022 Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Erickson, Aurelia) |
Filing 9 Affidavit of Service upon Haidong Liu served on 5/23/2022 Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Erickson, Aurelia) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued Electronically as to Global Trade Enterprises, Inc., Haidong Liu, Sammy Woo. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (Attachments: #1 Issues summons Liu, #2 Issued summons Woo) (ecp) |
Filing 7 Proposed Summons Sammy Woo Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Erickson, Aurelia) |
Filing 6 Proposed Summons David Doe Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Erickson, Aurelia) |
Filing 5 Proposed Summons Sam Doe Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Erickson, Aurelia) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons Haidong Liu Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Erickson, Aurelia) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons Global Trade Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Erickson, Aurelia) |
![]() |
Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8519390 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Shouwen Fu, Jiyou Cao, Hongjiang Li, Chen Li against David Doe, Sam Doe, Global Trade Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Duck House Chinese Restaurant, Haidong Liu, a/k/a John Liu, Sammy Woo (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Erickson, Aurelia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.