MX Solutions, LLC v. Arnold Transportation Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: MX Solutions, LLC
Defendant: Arnold Transportation Services, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2022cv01653
Filed: October 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Michael W Mosman
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2022 Filing 10 Transmittal of Certified Copy of Docket Sheet and certified copy of Order on motion to remand 9 to Multnomah County Circuit Court. (dino)
December 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: The Joint Motion to Remand to State Court #7 is GRANTED. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (joha)
December 1, 2022 Filing 8 Declaration of Steven Wilker . Filed by Arnold Transportation Services, Inc.. (Related document(s): Motion to Remand #7 .) (Le Chevallier, Gabriel)
December 1, 2022 Filing 7 Joint Motion to Remand to State Court. Filed by Arnold Transportation Services, Inc.. (Le Chevallier, Gabriel)
November 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint #5 is GRANTED. Defendant shall respond to the Complaint by 12/5/2022. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (joha)
November 3, 2022 Filing 5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint. Filed by Arnold Transportation Services, Inc.. (Le Chevallier, Gabriel)
October 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael W. Mosman and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 2/27/2023. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 3/27/2023. Pretrial Order is due by 3/27/2023. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dino)
October 27, 2022 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Arnold Transportation Services, Inc.. (Paternoster, Charles)
October 27, 2022 Filing 2 Declaration of Charles J. Paternoster in Support of Defendant's Notice of Removal. Filed by Arnold Transportation Services, Inc.. (Related document(s): Notice of Removal, #1 .) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (Paternoster, Charles)
October 27, 2022 Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 22CV33460 from Circuit Court for the State of Oregon, Multnomah County. Filing Fee in amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8703919 issued. Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1.. Filed by Arnold Transportation Services, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Paternoster, Charles)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MX Solutions, LLC v. Arnold Transportation Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MX Solutions, LLC
Represented By: Paul M. Balmer
Represented By: Steven M. Wilker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arnold Transportation Services, Inc.
Represented By: Charles J. Paternoster
Represented By: Gabriel Joseph Le Chevallier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?