SpecialtyCare Inc. et al v. Providence Health Plan
| Sentient Physicians, PC, SpecialtyCare Inc. and Remote Neuromonitoring Physicians, PC |
| Providence Health Plan |
| 3:2024cv02165 |
| December 30, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Karin J Immergut |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Joint Rule 26(f) Report and Discovery Plan . Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Hineline, Curt) |
| Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Providence Health Plan. (Marisseau, Medora) |
| Filing 11 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. |
| Filing 10 Answer to #1 Complaint, Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Filed by Providence Health Plan. (Marisseau, Medora) |
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR EXTENSION: Defendant's Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint, ECF #8 , is GRANTED IN PART. Defendant's Motion does not show good cause. Further, Defendant's request is not timely as Defendant's responsive pleading was due on 1/24/2025. ECF #5 . However, this Court will grant a limited extension. Accordingly, Defendant's responsive pleading is due on or before February 12, 2025. Parties are advised that all future requests for an extension must be filed seven (7) days in advance of the relevant deadline and must show good cause. Ordered on 2/5/2025 by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (jy)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer . Filed by Providence Health Plan. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Marisseau, Medora) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Appearance of Medora A. Marisseau appearing on behalf of Providence Health Plan. Filed by on behalf of Providence Health Plan. (Marisseau, Medora) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Hineline, Curt) |
| Filing 5 Affidavit of Service upon Providence Health Plan served on 1/3/2024, answer due on 1/24/2024 Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Hineline, Curt) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Providence Health Plan. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (gd) |
|
Filing 3
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Karin J. Immergut and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 4/30/2025. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 5/30/2025. Pretrial Order is due by 5/30/2025. Ordered by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (gd)
|
| Filing 2 Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman to Judge Karin J. Immergut. (eo) |
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $405 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9695813 Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by SpecialtyCare Inc, Neuromonitoring Physicians, PC, Sentient Physicians, PC against Providence Health Plan (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons). (Hineline, Curt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
