Accident Insurance Company, Inc. v. Enchill Painting & Renovation, LLC et al
Accident Insurance Company, Inc. |
Enchill Painting & Renovation, LLC, Jade Group Inc., CSM CY Lloyd Center, L.L.C. and Rayborn's Plumbing, Inc. |
3:2025cv00458 |
March 18, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
Youlee Yim You |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to CSM CY Lloyd Center, L.L.C., Enchill Painting & Renovation, LLC, Jade Group Inc., Rayborn's Plumbing, Inc.. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (gd) |
![]() |
Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $405 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9782863 Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Accident Insurance Company against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Underlying Complain, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - 3rd Party Complaint, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - Insurance Policy, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Proposed Summons Defendant Enchill, #6 Proposed Summons Defendant Jade Group, #7 Proposed Summons Defendant CSM CY Lloyd Center, #8 Proposed Summons Defendant Rayborn's Plumbing). (Adams, Bryce) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.