Strek v. The Humane Society of The United States
Plaintiff: Kathleen Strek
Defendant: The Humane Society Of The United States
Case Number: 6:2012cv01610
Filed: September 7, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Eugene (6) Office
Presiding Judge: Michael R. Hogan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 5 . Plaintiff's OSHA whistle blowing claim is dismissed. Signed on 10-14/12 by U.S. District Judge Michael R. Hogan. (sln)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Strek v. The Humane Society of The United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Humane Society Of The United States
Represented By: Karla Grossenbacher
Represented By: Andrew M. Schpak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathleen Strek
Represented By: Glenn N. Solomon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?