Bell v. Persson

Petitioner: William Bell
Respondent: Rob Persson
Case Number: 6:2012cv02367
Filed: December 31, 2012
Court: Oregon District Court
Office: Eugene (6) Office
Presiding Judge: Janice M. Stewart
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 19, 2014 34 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge Stewarts recommendation, and I ADOPT the F&R 30 as my own opinion. Because petitioner has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability is granted as to the following issues: whethertrial counsel was ineffective in failing to investigate Petitioners case, causing Petitioner to enter a guilty plea that was not knowing and voluntary. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Signed on 6/19/14 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bell v. Persson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Rob Persson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?