Le Roux v. Central Oregon Truck Company, Inc.
Plaintiff: Michael Le Roux
Defendant: Central Oregon Truck Company, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2017cv00533
Filed: April 4, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Eugene (6) Office
Presiding Judge: Jolie A. Russo
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Employment
Cause of Action: Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 37 OPINION AND ORDER: Defendant's motion for summary judgment 20 is DENIED. The parties' Pretrial Order is due thirty (30) days from the date of this Opinion. Signed on 6/28/2018 by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (jk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Le Roux v. Central Oregon Truck Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Central Oregon Truck Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Le Roux
Represented By: Timothy C. Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?