King et al v. Vial Fotheringham LLP
| Carolyn King and Edgar King |
| Vial Fotheringham LLP |
| 6:2018cv02203 |
| December 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Mustafa T Kasubhai |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. Plaintiffs' counsel having informed the court that he is not available to appear at the Rule 16 Conference set for 2/19/2019, it is ordered that the Rule 16 Conference is vacated and will be reset by separate order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (plb)
|
|
Filing 9
Scheduling Order: Rule 16 Conference is set for 2/19/2019 at 10:30AM in Eugene by telephone before Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. The Court will initiate the call. Please use a land line connection without external noise. The court prohibits speaker phones due to the greatly diminished sound quality. The parties should be prepared to discuss the status of discovery, any actual or potential discovery related conflicts, consent to a magistrate judge, potential trial dates, other issues presented by this action, and proposed modifications to the schedule outlined in the initial Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order issued by the court at the commencement of the action. The parties additionally should be prepared to discuss Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) pursuant to L.R. 16.4. Pursuant to this minute order the parties are relieved of their responsibility set forth in the Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order, Section (c). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (jk)
|
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Vial Fotheringham LLP. (Radmacher, Jonathan) |
| Filing 7 Answer to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand , Affirmative Defenses, Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, Counterclaim All Plaintiffs. Filed by Vial Fotheringham LLP. (Johnson, Katie) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Granting Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #4 . Answer is due by 2/6/2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (jk)
|
| Filing 5 Affidavit of Service of Summons Issued #3 upon Vial Fotheringham LLP served on 12/27/2018 Filed by Edgar King; Carolyn King. (Eblen, Timothy) |
| Filing 4 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer . Filed by Vial Fotheringham LLP. (Radmacher, Jonathan) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to Vial Fotheringham LLP. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (bd) |
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 4/22/2019. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 5/20/2019. Pretrial Order is due by 5/20/2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (bd)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: 0979-5678735 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Edgar King, Carolyn King against Vial Fotheringham LLP (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Eblen, Timothy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
