Vance v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
Logan Harris Vance |
MTD Products and Sears Holdings Corporation |
6:2019cv01275 |
August 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Mustafa T Kasubhai |
Personal Inj. Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice. Filed by Logan Harris Vance. (bd) |
Filing 5 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai: Findings & Recommendation #4 is referred to Judge Michael J. McShane. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 10/8/2019.) (jk) |
Filing 4 Findings & Recommendation: The Court recommends denying Vance's application to proceed IFP #2 based on the information in Vance's economic application, and the Court should decline ruling on the merits of his claims. His complaint #1 should be dismissed without prejudice. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 10/21/2019. Signed on 10/7/2019 by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 10/8/2019.) (jk) |
Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 8/14/19.) (kf) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed IFP filed by Logan Harris Vance. (kf) |
Filing 1 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Logan Harris Vance against Sears Holdings Corporation, MTD Products. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (kf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.