May Trucking Company v. Transport Equipment Marketing Group
| May Trucking Company |
| Transport Equipment Marketing Group, LLC and Transport Equipment Marketing Group |
| 6:2019cv01380 |
| August 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Mustafa T Kasubhai |
| Contract: Other Contract Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Reply to Defendant's Answer and Counterclaims. Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Related document(s): Answer to Complaint-Notice of Removal,, Counterclaim, #7 .) (Carey, Gordon) |
Filing 8
Scheduling Order: Rule 16 Conference is set for 11/5/2019 at 09:45AM in Eugene by telephone before Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. The Court will initiate the call. Please use a land line connection without external noise. The court prohibits speaker phones due to the greatly diminished sound quality. The parties should be prepared to discuss the status of discovery, any actual or potential discovery related conflicts, consent to a magistrate judge, potential trial dates, other issues presented by this action, and proposed modifications to the schedule outlined in the initial Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order issued by the court at the commencement of the action. The parties additionally should be prepared to discuss Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) pursuant to L.R. 16.4. Pursuant to this minute order the parties are relieved of their responsibility set forth in the Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order, Section (c). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (jk)
|
| Filing 7 Answer to Complaint following a Notice of Removal (Related Doc. #1 ) with Jury Demand titled "Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims", Counterclaim May Trucking Company. Filed by Transport Equipment Marketing Group. (Gallegos, Stanton) |
| Filing 6 Notification of CM/ECF Account for Matthew R. Doherty (Pro Hac Vice admission). Your login is: mrdoherty. Go to #the CM/ECF login page to set your password. (ck) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Granting Application for Special Admission Pro Hac Vice of Matthew R. Doherty for Transport Equipment Marketing Group. Application Fee in amount of $300 collected. Receipt No. 0979-5986211 issued. Signed on 9/3/2019 by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (ck)
|
| Filing 4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Matthew R. Doherty . Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: 0979-5986211. Filed by Transport Equipment Marketing Group. (Gallegos, Stanton) |
|
Filing 3
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 12/27/2019. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 1/27/2020. Pretrial Order is due by 1/27/2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (bd)
|
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Transport Equipment Marketing Group, LLC. (Gallegos, Stanton) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 19CV35867 from Marion County Circuit Court. Filing Fee in amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: 0979-5981312 issued. Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1.. Filed by Transport Equipment Marketing Group, LLC (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Gallegos, Stanton) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
