Geer v. Laney
Petitioner: Carl Edwin Geer, II
Respondent: Garrett Laney
Case Number: 6:2019cv01768
Filed: November 4, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Michael J McShane
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Notice of Attorney Substitution:Attorney Oliver W. Loewy is substituted as counsel of record in place of Attorney Lisa Hay Filed by Carl Edwin Geer, II. (Loewy, Oliver)
December 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Notice of Attorney Substitution:Attorney Kristen E. Boyd is substituted as counsel of record in place of Attorney Lynn David Larsen Filed by Garrett Laney. (Boyd, Kristen)
December 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Acceptance and Acknowledgment of Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Scheduling Order upon the State Attorney General on behalf of Garrett Laney. Filed by Garrett Laney. (Larsen, Lynn)
December 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Habeas Corpus Scheduling Order Serving Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2254 #2 on respondent. Answer is due by 2/3/2020. Signed on 12/3/19 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (Attachments: #1 Acceptance/Acknowledgement Form, #2 2254 Petition) (kf)
December 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Denying as Moot Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #1 ; Granting Motion for Appointment of Counsel #3 . The Federal Public Defender is appointed to represent petitioner in this proceeding. Signed on 12/3/19 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 12/4/19.) (kf)
November 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (joha)
November 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing fee in amount of $5.00 collected; Receipt No. 86340 issued. (ljc)
November 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Michael J. McShane. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 11/4/2019.) (dsg)
November 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (dsg)
November 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Carl Edwin Geer, II. (dsg)
November 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254 - State). In forma pauperis pending. Filed by Carl Edwin Geer, II against Garrett Laney. (dsg)
November 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Carl Edwin Geer, II. (dsg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Geer v. Laney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Garrett Laney
Represented By: Lynn David Larsen
Represented By: Kristen E. Boyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Carl Edwin Geer, II
Represented By: Lisa Hay
Represented By: Oliver W. Loewy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?